In Defense of the Comment First Method of Retweeting

Twitter is the wild wild west of social networking: no rules (except the 140 character limit), public by default, and it’s okay to eavesdrop and/or butt-in on other people’s conversations. Filtering between technical tweets, philosophical diatribes, humorous hashtags, and mindless chit chat is between you and your twitter client. But even gunslingers have a moral code, and giving credit to the originator of the thought is #1 on Twitter. Hence the rise of the retweet. Quoting, even electronically (hell, maybe especially electronically), is still the ultimate in flattery.

So if we were writing a term paper, there’d be a clear grammar rules on how to quote an author. The Elements of Style has yet to add a Twitter section, however, so community has created its own conventions.  

RT vs. Via: Cage Match

While  ‘RT:’ is the most common way to acknowledge another’s thought, I’ve also seen ‘(via @another)’. I’m not a fan of the latter, mainly because I’m a char hog. There’s no way I’m spending 6 of my 140 chars on a ‘via’ when I can spend 4 on a ‘RT:’.  In a pinch, I can drop the colon on a ‘RT’ and get that bad boy down to 3.

But char count is not the sole consideration in my preference. If you’ve ever had to conform to specific rules of quoting in a school paper, you may have rationalized the insanely overdone formatting by acknowledging that it at least served a purpose: no one is going to mistake quoted material as your original thought. And therein lays trouble in the RT world: distinguishing the original tweet from your comment.

If most users read their tweet stream as I do, they work through the tweets, noting first the profile image of the poster, and then the content. By my way of thinking, an actual quote should acknowledge the break in thought at the beginning of the quote, with a ‘RT:’, not after the fact, with a ‘via’. By the time I reach a ‘via’, I’ve already associated the content with the retweeter, and must readjust.

Adding Your Take

Retweeters wishing to comment on a RT will usually then add some punctuation (usually >, but I’ve seen –, and the char hogging <<—) to the end of the RT to distinguish their comment from the original content.

While this distinguishes comment from the original tweet, I prefer the method of commenting first, and then repeating the quoted tweet on which I’m commenting. Of course, this means the reader will be reading the response before the original tweet, so the context of the comment is not clear until the end. Since I’m a wise cracker, I like this, and use it to my comedic advantage.

Twitter Image for User JoyKnowsThey give badges for going on benders now? Scouting has changed. RT: @cathbot I just unlocked the ‘Bender’ badge on Foursquare!

But even in serious tweets, the Comment First Method also seems more like natural conversation, especially when recommending something:

Twitter Image for User JoyKnowsExcellent article! RT: @spgnome New Blog Post: “Freeing Your SharePoint Inner Child” http://&#8230;

But the Comment First Method really earns its keep in situations involving multiple retweets. Check this example of the traditional Comment Last Method. Note how we have to play ‘Match the Comment with the Author’, by looking for the comment at the end and the author at the beginning. Sort of like finding the matching opening and closing parentheses in a complex Excel formula. Hint: @Number1 posted first.

Twitter Image for User Number4

RT @Number 3 RT: @Number2 RT:@Number1 First!>Second Place!(always a bridesmaid!)<<Me Three!<<Go fourth and multiply! (get it?)

The Comment First version of this same exchange would look like this:

Twitter image for user Number4

Go fourth and multiply! (get it?)RT: @Number3 Me Three! RT: @Number2 Second Place!(always a bridesmaid!) RT: @Number1 First!

What I like about the results of the Comment First Method is that each person’s contribution immediately follows their username, and the RT works as a section break between authors, without the need for unnecessary chars.


About Joy Lavigne (Adkins)

SharePoint and O365 Business Analyst for a mid-sized organization. Recovering SharePoint on-prem Administrator. Frequent speaker at SharePoint Saturday events. Teller of terribly corny jokes. View all posts by Joy Lavigne (Adkins)

One response to “In Defense of the Comment First Method of Retweeting

  • Clayton Cobb

    I really dislike the via method, because the same thing happens every time – I think the person who posted it is the original author, and I have no idea it’s a retweet until the very end. I see no reason to do it this way when it’s confusing and takes up more space.

    As for the RT method, I prefer to comment at the end, because I prefer to SEE comments at the end after I’ve read the comment that is being retweeted. Otherwise, I have no context and have to skip the reply, read the original tweet, then come back and read the new reply. I can understand how it may fit better based on the nature of the RT, but there is no context to the First Comment before reading the quoted text…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: